Glad to help From: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> Date: Monday, October 25, 2021 at 9:41 AM To: Rich Salz <[email protected]> Cc: Achim Kraus <[email protected]>, Hanno Böck <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [TLS] DTLS RRC and heartbeat
Rich, Hanno, Mohit, Thanks a lot for your excellent input. We are going to follow your advice and avoid overloading heartbeat then. Scope-wise, RRC will focus on path validation and liveliness use cases, leaving PMTU discovery out, at least for the moment. cheers, On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:45 PM Salz, Rich <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > And we are not sure, if considering mainly implementation issues, will justify to allocate a new code-point. As one of the three TLS registry experts, let me tell you not to be worried about requesting a new codepoint. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls__;!!GjvTz_vk!Eeto3IhgNvAs-fuQuW3f8r9ToWWyxEm_a6VHztwS_H52jjnmkZInzPkc1loF$> -- Thomas
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
