> On 12. Nov 2021, at 12:22, John Mattsson 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Achim,
>  
> My interest in DTLS Connection IDs is mainly for non-constrained use cases 
> such as DTLS/SCTP (DTLS over SCTP) between nodes in the 5G core network.
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis/
>  
> The current plan is to mandate use of connection IDs for both DTLS 1.2 and 
> DTLS 1.3.
Please note that Ericsson has filed
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5195/
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5218/
which might have an impact on what you can implement and/or use in the
above mentioned use-case.

Best regards
Michael
>  
> Cheers,
> John
>  
> From: Achim Kraus <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, 12 November 2021 at 10:32
> To: John Mattsson <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [TLS] Up to date overview of TLS implementations?
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id, I have some views ("overview" may
> be something else).
> 
> Eclipse/Californium, Release 3.0 (3. November 2021), Java, CoAP + DTLS
> 1.2, supports/configurable both deprecated variants (old MAC and
> deprecated extension code-point 53) and RFC9146 variant (new MAC and
> extension code-point 54).
> 
> Eclipse/Leshan, Java, LwM2M, using Californium and current development
> of leshan is updated to use Californium 3.0.
> 
> Eclipse/tinydtls, C, DTLS 1.2, on my list (but for now I'm still too
> busy with Californium).
> 
> Mbedtls 3.0, C, ongoing, 
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b8474e79-e7dc7745-b8470ee2-86b1886cfa64-2c1d54f96c0a9e76&q=1&e=c259a055-7f88-4bac-a4f8-bc722e69c000&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FARMmbed%2Fmbedtls%2Fpull%2F5061
> 
> Tools:
> 
> Wireshark, implemented,
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/17695
> 
> Zephyr, waiting on mbedtls,
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=37e00812-687b312e-37e04889-86b1886cfa64-88e9e9f09c0d6a34&q=1&e=c259a055-7f88-4bac-a4f8-bc722e69c000&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fzephyrproject-rtos%2Fzephyr%2Fpull%2F36738
> 
> best regards
> Achim Kraus
> 
> 
> Am 12.11.21 um 09:55 schrieb John Mattsson:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any up to date overwiew of which TLS libraries support or are
> > working on support for new and upcoming stuff like:
> >
> > RFC 8879 TLS Certificate Compression
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-subcerts
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-dtls13
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-esni
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to