Hi! I have created an issue to track this review: https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team/issues/79
Cheers, spt > On Nov 15, 2021, at 14:05, Scott Bradner via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Scott Bradner > Review result: Has Nits > > This is an OPS-DIR review of Guidance for External PSK Usage in TLS > <draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance>. > > As its title indicates, this ID provides guidance for the use of pre-shared > keys with TLS. Guidance documents are inherently useful to operations > community > and this is no exception. > > I found the document well written, slightly repetitive as Rich noted, but not > so much so as for it to be an issue for me. > > A few notes though. > > in section 4.2 the term PAKE is used without any definition – there is a > reference to a document but it seems to be that at least expanding the term in > this document would be useful. > > the document uses the term SHOULD in a number of places. (e.g. multiple > places > in section 7 and one in section 8) – for what its worth – I am not a fan of > the > use of this term unless the text also says when not doing what the SHOULD says > to do is OK – i.e. since SHOULD is a MUST with an escape clause – I think it > is > useful to actually say what the escape clause is – i.e. explain why this is > not > a MUST. (also it does seem a bit funky to say (as section 7 does) “MUST > adhere” to requirements which are SHOULDs ) > > > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
