On 11/29/21, 22:40, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[email protected]> wrote: On 11/29/21 11:29 AM, Andrei Popov wrote: > Perhaps I missed some part of this thread, but it’s still not clear to > me what would be the purpose of adding supported_versions extension to a > TLS 1.2 implementation? What problem(s) would that solve? Based in part on discussion here, we (the authors of 6125bis) concluded Typo: should be 7525bis (the TLS BCP). [1] that we don't need to recommend adding the supported_versions extension to TLS 1.2-only implementations. If folks find that decision problematic, do let us know. Peter _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list |
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
