On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:25 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz= [email protected]> wrote:
> > It is probably "best" (for some definition of "best") to publish an > RFC > that Updates: 9102 and has the revised directive to IANA. > > I hope that is excessive. > > > Probably an errata report should be filed against RFC 9102 regardless. > IANA might be able to use the errata report without the updating RFC, > but you'd have to ask. > > I would go this route. File an errata, and email the registry and see if > that's sufficient documentation. > Seems like it's a publicly available permanent document, so it should be enough. If IANA doesn't think so, well, we're preparing 8447-bis -Ekr > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
