Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Using lowercase "not" together with an uppercase RFC2119 keyword is not acceptable usage. Found: "SHOULD not" Thanks to Brian Carpenter for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/vpFO8fQNaWU_qRWSelGo99K3rVY). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NIT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. Document references draft-ietf-quic-transport, but that has been published as RFC9000. Reference [RFC5246] to RFC5246, which was obsoleted by RFC8446 (this may be on purpose). _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
