Hi Marco, We think we have addressed all your comments (but one, see below). Could you please check that the PR at [1] is good to go?
[1] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/63/files The one comment we wanted to have a bit more discussion before deciding how to proceed is this: On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 15:50, Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca=40ri...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > [Section 7.4] > > * I think that another requirement should be that the initiator MUST NOT act > on more than one valid path_response or path_drop message for each > path_challenge message that it has sent. ยง7.4 currently says: "The responder MUST send exactly one path_response or path_drop message for each received path_challenge." So it's not clear how a situation with multiple occurrences of path_drop/path_challenge could come off, if the responder obeys the specified MUST? Could you clarify your concern a bit more? > [Section 10] > > * You will need to add a new subsection that provides expert review > instructions, for the Designated Experts assigned to the new subregistry > defined in Section 10.3. Thanks: this made us realise that expert review was a bit too lightweight, therefore we moved to STD required. cheers, thanks! _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
