>> I assume you are concerned about the ContentType registry. I think it's okay 
>> to add something here.

> Yes that’s the one. I mean we have 240+ spaces, but it is technically one of 
> our more scarce spaces.

Yes but I still think it's fine.

>> I missed the detail about the RRC Message Type registry, and it would be 
>> nice to have a portion of it set aside for private use and experimentation.

> Since the TLS WG is managing that one for a bit, we can the reservations in 
> before we progress. What are you thinking like 2 values at the end?

Sure.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to