The draft itself is an exercise in clear communication, and mentioning PQC explicitly fits with that. Thus I agree with Rich to keep it.
Best, Bas On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:18 PM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > - that is implied by a "feature freeze". No reason to highlight PQC > (even though it is a hype topic right now). > > Yes, to both of these. But I still think it should be explicitly called > out. If the WG thinks otherwise, then fine, the document is that much > shorter :) >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
