Peter knows more about long-term embedded systems that use TLS than anyone else 
on this list.  I trust him. Don’t think of things connected to the public 
Internet, but rather things like client-auth missle launching systems, seismic 
(nuclear) monitoring equipment, and the like.  Stuff that you cannot pick up 
anywhere retail off-the-shelf, but is rather purpose-built.

Having said that, I don’t want this draft to make his job harder; I’d rather my 
electric grid didn’t break :) But given that, and since he doesn’t have a 
specific concern in-hand right now, and that I think it is important and useful 
to send a clear signal to the global community, I’d still like to see the draft 
adopted and eventually published.

It sends an active signal about new features, as opposed to a passive signal of 
just not accepting work. In my experience in security, active signals are 
better than passive ones.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to