This is outside the scope of TLSWG, but there's not really a clean mapping from client->server and server->client packets to requests and responses, so I would suggest you introduce types that are clearer..
-Ekr On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 9:50 AM JustAnotherArchivist < [email protected]> wrote: > WARC records have 'types' ('WARC-Type' header field), and the two > relevant ones here are 'request' and 'response'. The names come from > HTTP of course, but we'd use them analogously for client-to-server and > server-to-client TLS records, respectively. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
