> This version incorporates all known issues. The authors believe this version
> is ready for WGLC.
Yes, pretty much. Two nits than can be fixed during AUTH48
This sentence in Sec 15 confuses me:
For this reason, designated experts should decline code point
registrations for documents which have already been adopted or are being
proposed for adoption by IETF working groups or IRTF research groups.
Presumably, you want the RG/WG chair to make the request? Or do you mean
"other than the TLS WG" ?
Also, a nit, sometimes the tense is not consistent. For example, Sec 5 says:
Ciphersuites marked as EXPORT use weak ciphers and were deprecated in
TLS 1.1 [RFC4346].
Cipher suites marked as anon do not provide any authentication and are
vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks and are deprecated in TLS 1.1 [RFC4346].
RC4 is a weak cipher and is deprecated in [RFC7465].
A mix of "were" "are" and "is" in three consecutive sentences :)
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
