*   I've read it before. I the main issue is that it says "trusted" a lot.

Yeah, kinda snippy but not necessarily wrong.

I’m a little skeptical of approaches that solve an entire problem space with 
one architecture. I’m more skeptical of enough people having the ability to 
read and understand the semantics of several pages of JSON object descriptions. 
I know I got MEGO[1] a copule of times while reading it.

Can we simplify things and solve just one problem?

For example, in some off-line discuissions others have mentioned that with PQ 
signatures being so big, there are policy decisions that clients might want to 
enforce – do you need SCT’s? Do you want OCSP stapling? Maybe it will be 
worthwhile to just think about what kind hybrid/PQ policies clients will want 
to express?

[1] https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/mego

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to