That would address your concern. John
From: Salz, Rich <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 4 December 2024 at 15:21 To: John Mattsson <[email protected]>, Sean Turner <[email protected]>, TLS List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze >TLS 1.3 enjoys robust >security proofs and provides excellent security as-is. as-is, TLS 1.3 does not provide excellent security for long-term connections. It removes essential features such as asymmetric rekeying and reauthentication. Would changing it to “provides excellent security for many use-cases as-is” address your concern? Or “can provide excellent security”? Or does that open up the case where people say “where does not it apply?” Would it be better to just remove the “and provides” phrase altogether?
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
