Hi, while I agree with some concerns expressed on the list that SLH-DSA is not the best choice for TLS, I think that having a conservative PQ signature algorithm is still desired and outweighs these concerns. The document is short, presumably non-controversial and will unlikely take much WG resources. Thus I support adoption.
Regards, Valery. > We are continuing with our WG adoption calls for the following I-D: Use of > SLH- > DSA in TLS 1.3 [1]; see [2] for more information about this tranche of > adoption > calls. If you support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, > please > send a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, > please send > a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close at 2359 UTC on > 30 May > 2025. > > Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the > mandatory-to- > implement cipher suites in TLS. > > Cheers, > Joe and Sean > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-tls-slhdsa/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/ > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
