Hi, Mahesh, On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 19:24, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> wrote: > In this draft PR [2], I have attempted to capture the essence of the > 'Updates'. Could you please confirm whether this would work for you? > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/f_JWgsCbxKIaDX1AcD8e47MIWUU/ > [2] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/101/commits/7655b19e > > > Thanks for making the change. But my DISCUSS is for the lack of similar text > in the Abstract. It does not have to provide all the explanation you provide > in Introduction for why you are updating RFC9146, but just say that it > updates RFC9146.
Got it. Please see: https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/101/commits/60d527491 BTW, your email made me realise that the same rationale for updating 9146 also applies to 9147, which is reflected in the commit above. cheers, t _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
