I support adoption. We've already implemented an earlier iteration of this in BoringSSL.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025, 11:00 Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote: > We should adopt this draft. It adds useful new functionality to TLS, and > it is correctly agnostic as to the specific PAKE. > > I believe some of my Cisco colleagues are planning to implement, or at > least use it. > > --Richard > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 9:04 AM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > >> At IETF 122 & 123 we discussed draft-bmw-tls-pake13 [0]. The sense of >> room @ both sessions was that there was support for working on PAKEs in TLS. >> >> This email starts the WG adoption call for draft-bmw-tls-pake13. If you >> support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send >> a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, please >> send a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close at 2359 >> UTC on 07 August 2025. >> >> Cheers, >> Deirdre, Joe, and Sean >> >> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bmw-tls-pake13/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
