On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 9:38 AM D. J. Bernstein <d...@cr.yp.to> wrote:
> Joseph Salowey writes: > > The chairs feel that the following is the best approach to move forward: > > Adopt the draft and park it > > There was a call _for adoption_. The specified call period is over. The > chairs now have to issue a clear declaration of either "Yes, there was > consensus to adopt" or "No, there was not consensus to adopt", so that > there's a record of the result and so that people who think the chairs > erred (in whichever direction) have the ability to appeal I also find myself confused by the email from the chairs. Is it trying to say "we believe there is consensus to adopt the draft and so it is hereby adopted" or "we believe this is the right way forward and we are taking the WG's temperature". Chairs, can you please clarify? -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
