On Thu, 25 Sep 2025, Sophie Schmieg wrote:

So from a practical point of view, there is simply no guidance to give 
implementers. Not only are such errors incredibly unlikely, they also behave 
exactly the same
as corrupted ciphertexts, and your stack will handle those, since there is no 
difference to the behavior in the case of ECDH.

I think there is consensus that there is no advise to give to implementers
to handle these failure cases. While we could use that to justify saying
nothing, my own preference is to at least have a sentence explicitely
saying that implementers should do nothing, in case implementers become
aware of these theortical failures and wrongly assume the specification
was not aware and thus "vulnerable" to these issues.

Perhaps:

Current:
        Some post-quantum key exchange algorithms, including ML-KEM
        [NIST-FIPS-203], have non-zero probability of failure, meaning two
        honest parties may derive different shared secrets. This would cause a
        handshake failure. ML-KEM has a cryptographically small failure rate; if
        other algorithms are used, implementers should be aware of the potential
        of handshake failure.  Clients MAY retry if a failure is encountered.

New:
        Some post-quantum key exchange algorithms, including ML-KEM
        [NIST-FIPS-203], have non-zero probability of failure, meaning
        two honest parties may derive different shared secrets. This
        would cause a handshake failure. As with other similar failures
        (such as bit corruptions), Clients MAY retry if a failure is
        encountered. Due to the negliable rate of occurances of these
        failure events, the lack of a known feasable method and the
        additional risk of introducing new attack vectors when attempting
        to handle these events, it is RECOMMENDED for implementers to
        not specifically handle post-quantum key exchange shared secrets
        failures, and rely on the pre-existing code paths that handle
        derivation failures.

If someone can write up a better and shorter text, please send in your
proposed text.

Paul

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to