Ah, whoops! On Fri, Oct 10, 2025, 5:07 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 1:03 PM Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The drafts and the profile currently do not make Recommendations or >> MTI's, they make the options available; ekr has now raised promoting one >> hybrid option as Recommended = Y. Not everyone can or should use the same >> options, we have a diversity of curves for example >> > > Actually, I proposed marking all three as Recommend = Y :) > > >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 3:56 PM Rob Sayre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 12:33 PM Deirdre Connolly < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> CNSA 2.0 does not support hybrids in general, and their TLS profile >>>> only supports ML-KEM-1024: >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-becker-cnsa2-tls-profile/ >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> But why is that? See this thread from the IETF general list: >>> >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Xei2iDOk6zorD4oFnLoJ5mAdkdQ/ >>> >>> As pointed out in that thread, all of these drafts seem to conflict with >>> the rationale in draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Rob >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
