Hi Rob -

In the TLP, Section 6.c is part of Section 6.  Section 6 is about IETF Documents.  Read the preface of section 6 and explain to me how this section or subsections were ever meant to apply to a submission to an IETF mailing list? See section 1 to understand that the TLP considers IETF Documents and IETF Contributions to be different things.  Also 2.c.

"Contributor" in section 6.c should be read to mean a contributor of an IETF document.

All of the modified (e.g. restricted use) inclusion language is for a "Document", not an email submission.   A little bit like trying to put a dog collar on a wolf.  They're both canids, but the collar won't fit.

In any event, IANAL, and AFAIK, neither are you or DJB.  I suggest that we leave the IESG, the IETF Trust/IPR Corp and the various lawyers to sort this out and avoid putting our fingers into the pot unless we have something definitive and factual to say.

BTW - the answer to your question has been answered by the ADs.  The answer was *_NO_*.  That's definitive in this process.   I support the decision of the AD in this case - but that's just me.

Later, Mike


On 10/14/2025 18:47, Rob Sayre wrote:
Hi,

[no sec-ads],

Hasn't he done it right this time, no matter the merits of the rest of the appeal?

https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/trust-legal-provisions/tlp-5/

It's in Section 6.c:

"If a Contributor chooses to limit the right to make modifications and derivative works of an IETF Contribution [...]"

thanks,
Rob


On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 3:32 PM Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 13 Oct 2025, D. J. Bernstein wrote:

    [ message not quoted because of your included IETF policy modifier
    boilerplate ]

    Dan,

    You keep addressing your message to both Security ADs, and we already
    explained before [1][2], and as confirmed by the IESG to be within the
    rights of the Security ADs [3], that as Responsible AD, only I will be
    handling this complaint.

    Your email dated Oct 13 2025 still contains a disclaimer that attempts
    to modify the IETF Standards Process. I addressed this in in [1]
    on June 12th:

            mails should not include language that violates BCP 9 RFC
    2026 Section
            10.2 or BCP 25 RFC3978 Section 3.2 and should not include
    processing
            instructions that are not backed by our Internet Standards
    Process.

    and again in [2] on October 7 2025:

             Additionally this time, both the email content and the
    remotely
             hosted PDF contain language indicating you are not accepting
             rights and obligations under the IETF Standards Process
    BCP9. As
             with all other activities in the IETF, the policies the Note
             Well reminds us of, also apply to the IETF conflict
    resolution
             and appeals processes.

    Thus, it cannot come as surprise that I still cannot process your
    email as a
    valid Appeal Contribution under RFC 2026.

    I also already explained why your current process modifier boilerplate
    cannot be valid in any stretch of interpretationi [4].


    As per IESG Appeal response [5], you have until 2025-10-15 to resubmit
    your message in a form that can be processed as a complaint/appeal
    under BCP9.

    Paul Wouters
    Security Area Director


    PS: Note that this also applies to your subsequent message that
    you sent out
    with Message-ID: <[email protected]>.
    This message I am responding to was held for moderator approval due to
    its size.  The mailman3 software has sent you a notify message warning
    you of this, but I pressume the IETF daemon software did not agree to
    the legal terms set forth by your autoresponder "QRsecrtary", and as
    such you did not see that message. Again, please resolve your email
    connectivity problems to avoid further undue noise on the TLS WG list.




    [1]
    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eSW2K3Ql1jzMcN-Aj1EYCGOLu9o/
    [2]
    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IqlxRU19yiL0rkaH5QwD9ARF7F4/
    [3]
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-the-conflict-resolution-and-appeals-processes/
    [4]
    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CgC9g_y1y5f3JQeMz_y9u2zMBxk/
    [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/iesg/appeals/artifact/146

    _______________________________________________
    TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
    To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to