Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-pkcs1-06: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-pkcs1/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Rifaat Shekh-Yusef for their secdir review. This specification needs to be PS so that TLS server implementations will modify their TLS offerings where client authentication is necessary. The same situation is true for 'N' vs 'D'. This specification allow clients using hardware storage devices (TPMs, Secure Elements, etc.) to migrate to TLS 1.3. I support those positions. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
