Hi Usama, > meeting has one hour overlap with SEAT WG, which is specifically focused on TLS.
We took the side meeting timeslot that the secretariat gave us. Avoiding 100% of conflicts is not always possible. > Besides, is there a reason for not sending it to UFMRG? To me, that seems more relevant. I don't know what that is, but feel free to forward, thanks. On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 at 10:58, Muhammad Usama Sardar < [email protected]> wrote: > On 03.11.25 11:15, Mike Ounsworth wrote: > > > I want to announce a side-meeting which is highly relevant to the > > community working on formal modelling of the TLS protocol. > > That sounds very interesting but it is unfortunate that your side > meeting has one hour overlap with SEAT WG, which is specifically focused > on TLS. > > Besides, is there a reason for not sending it to UFMRG? To me, that > seems more relevant. > > -Usama > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
