Correct!

spt

> On Nov 14, 2025, at 10:17, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Just clarifying that the plan is still to park this post-WGLC pending some 
> other implementations?
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 4:27 PM Sean Turner <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Just a reminder that this is still on-going.
>> 
>> spt
>> 
>> > On Nov 4, 2025, at 23:33, Sean Turner via Datatracker <[email protected] 
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-wkech-11 (Ends 2025-11-25)
>> > 
>> > This message starts a 3-week WG Last Call for this document.
>> > 
>> > Abstract:
>> >   We define a well-known URI at which an HTTP origin can inform an
>> >   authoritative DNS server, or other interested parties, about its
>> >   Service Bindings.  Service binding data can include Encrypted
>> >   ClientHello (ECH) configurations, that may change frequently.  This
>> >   allows the HTTP origin, in collaboration with DNS infrastructure
>> >   elements, to publish and rotate its own ECH keys.  Other service
>> >   binding data such as information about TLS supported groups is
>> >   unlikely to change quickly, but the HTTP origin is much more likely
>> >   to have accurate information when changes do occur.  Service data
>> >   published via this mechanism is typically available via an HTTPS or
>> >   SVCB resource record.
>> > 
>> > File can be retrieved from:
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-wkech/
>> > 
>> > Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
>> > publication of this document by replying to this email keeping 
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are
>> > highly appreciated.
>> > 
>> > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
>> > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 
>> > 79
>> > [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
>> > provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
>> > any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy 
>> > can
>> > be found at [3].
>> > 
>> > Thank you.
>> > 
>> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
>> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
>> > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to