On Mon, Jan 5, 2026, at 12:11, Aijun Wang wrote:
> I think Christian gave the detail explanation for the reason that we 
> needs not, or should not touch the application logic themselves. 

That is not what I read.  Christian said:

> [...] I am not convinced at all by a proposition to 
insert a "session data continuity" mechanism at the TLS layer. Such 
functionality is application dependent, it belongs to the application, [...]

I agree.  Building a session layer is an application protocol concern.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to