Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # IESG review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03 CC @MikeBishop ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Typos #### Section 2, paragraph 1 ``` - in this document may be implemented in a FIPS approved way as - ^ + in this document may be implemented in a FIPS-approved way as + ^ ``` ### Capitalization of references Lowercasing `[rfc7748]` when all the other RFC references are all-caps is confusing some automated systems and looks odd. If there's not a particular reason for the difference, consider being consistent. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
