Dear Éric, Thank you for the review. I've tried to addressed your comments in following gihub pull request. Please see references inline below:
On 2/3/26 10:02, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke INT AD comments for draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-03 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points/nits. I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric Note: this ballot comments follow the Markdown syntax of https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/tree/main, i.e., they can be processed by a tool to create github issues. ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Section 2 Please add reference (at least expansion) for the FIPS and NIST acronyms (and of course prefix them with US to avoid any ambiguity).
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-ecdhe-mlkem/pull/64
### Section 5 Who is the "we" in `For this reason we put the ML-KEM shared secret first` ? The authors ? The WG ? The IETF ? Please avoid such ambiguities.
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-ecdhe-mlkem/pull/62
### Section 7 Please add a URI reference to the registry, e.g., https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-parameters-8
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-ecdhe-mlkem/pull/63 Please let me know in case you have further comments. Kind regards, Kris
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
