I still object, still for the same reason. Kurt
On February 12, 2026 8:05:22 PM GMT+01:00, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: >This message starts the second Working Group Last Call for the pure ML-KEM >document (draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-07). > > >The file can be retrieved from: > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/ > >The diff with the previous WGLC draft (-05) is here: > > >https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05&url2=draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-07&difftype=--html ><https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05&url2=draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-06&difftype=--html> > > >The main focus of this WGLC is to review new text providing more context >around the use of pure ML-KEM. For those who indicated they wanted this >text, please let us know if the new text satisfies you and if you support >publication. This working group last call will end on February 27, 2026. > > >Thank You.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
