On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 5:03 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz= [email protected]> wrote:
> > - My belief is that we should aim to document consensus on > - something like the above as an IETF position that applies to most > - IETF protocols. That'd avoid a lot of the controversy we're seeing > - with this draft, and will likely see with others. > > > It wouldn’t avoid the controversy, it would just concentrate it in one > place. And since it would be IETF-wide recommendation, not just TLS, SSH, > etc., I’d expect the temperature to be even hotter, and the odds of getting > an RFC published to be zero. > In case people have forgotten (I know you haven't Rich) we had exactly this discussion at DISPATCH in Montreal and the DISPATCH outcome was "Discuss on saag mailing list" [0]. Can those who want to discuss an IETF-wide policy please do *that* and not have that discussion here. -Ekr [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/124/materials/minutes-124-dispatch-202511031430-00 > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
