Hi, I support publication of this document. As has been remarked before, the code points have already been allocated so the question is really only whether we want to document them.
I think that OpenSSL's decision, as described by Viktor, to include pure ML-KEM but hide it behind a compiler flag, is the right choice: that way it's available for people who need it and won't bother anyone else. I guess that other TLS libraries and web browsers will take the same approach. That said, it's a shame that so much time and energy has been spent in this discussion. I hope the WG can leave this topic behind and move forward. Marc Penninga _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
