Hi Uri, Please remain civil. Myself and others have made sincere efforts to express our views in terms of technical arguments, and I’m sure that many believe that TLS being more resistant to classes of attacks does constitute an evident benefit to humanity.
If you would like to argue for your support of the ML-KEM only draft, you’re welcome to do so based on technical merit. But insulting or talking down to people, especially those junior to you, because you disagree with them, is misconduct that should not be permitted on this or any other IETF list. Thank you, Nadim Kobeissi Symbolic Software • https://symbolic.software > On 24 Feb 2026, at 6:01 AM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> 1. Make ECHDE/MLKEM Recommended=Y (as also suggested by Bas's draft). > > This is good. I support it. > > >> 2. Decline to publish draft-ietf-tls-mlkem > > > > This is the best case scenario outcome for TLS’s security and benefit > > to humanity in my view and I strongly support it. > > This is the worst case scenario, and I oppose it. > > Also, let’s leave “benefits to humanity” aside — somehow, majority of the > posters do not seem qualified to pronounce valid judgment on that scale, > regardless of how highly they might view themselves.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
