On 25/02/2026 21:50, Salz, Rich wrote:
You misunderstand what “addressed” means here. A perfectly reasonable response is “the issue has been discussed by the WG and they still want to move forward.” As another recent example, the LAMPS WG went ahead even though one participant (repeatedly:) raised patent concerns.
Despite me not wanting to see this document published, Rich is correct here. There are always judgement calls required and one participant being convinced there's a fatal flaw in something is not sufficient in itself to block that thing. If a participant convinces others of the fatality of the flaw, that may be different, but if something is generally contentious, (as in this case), a claim of a fatal flaw by itself blocks nothing. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
