On Thu, 5 Mar 2026, Nadim Kobeissi wrote:
I would also appreciate more transparency regarding what’s happening with FATT, especially given the series of inconsistent behaviors by the WG AD and chairs as it relates to the continued attempts to force through the adoption of the ML-KEM-only key agreement draft despite a lack of rough consensus. Now is not the time for the chairs to behave in a way that allows for uncharitable interpretations.
One, the Chairs and AD are still working on calling the 2nd WGLC outcome, so I find your phrasing very objectionable. And that's not even talking about the TLS list being drowend in message preventing a content discussion about text changes work that came to us as a work item after the 1st WGLC. Second, in your reading of the FATT process, we would need to pull both pure mlkem and the hybrid mlkem document. Is that what you are asking? Paul _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
