> On Mar 6, 2026, at 12:25, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:20 AM Sean Turner <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> snipping down the list
>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2026, at 15:08, Muhammad Usama Sardar
>>> <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> # Known implementation
>>>
>>> The only public implementation currently known to us is Cloudflare's
>>> opaque-ea [0], which as acknowledged [1] by Cloudflare, is a partial
>>> implementation of RFC9261. It implements TLS messages here [2] and is based
>>> on mint [3] - a minimal TLS 1.3 stack for learning purposes. Is there any
>>> other open-source implementation?
>>>
>>> For future, could we please reference the implementations within the RFCs
>>> (either in text or in "additional resources" in datatracker) to avoid the
>>> trouble to find it?
>>>
>>> The developers are ultimately aiming at code that they will use in
>>> production.
>>>
>> The shepherd write-up for the I-D that became RFC 6261 noted that there were
>> two implementations:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator/15/
>> I checked my mail and I can’t find any reference to those implementations
>> and I can’t remember the names.
>>
>> As far as including the implementations in the RFC, pretty sure that’s not
>> normally done.
>
> I don't think we should change that.
>
> Note that even in cases where we require implementations to be listed,
> as for promotion above PS, that goes in a separate report, not in the RFC:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026#section-4.1.2
>
> The Working Group chair is responsible for documenting the specific
> implementations which qualify the specification for Draft or Internet
> Standard status along with documentation about testing of the
> interoperation of these implementations. The documentation must
> include information about the support of each of the individual
> options and features. This documentation should be submitted to the
> Area Director with the protocol action request. (see Section 6
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026#section-6>)
>
> -Ekr
These implementation reports end up here:
https://www.ietf.org/participate/runningcode/implementation-reports/
spt
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
