On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:57 PM Valery Smyslov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The fix for (1) is straightforward: replace some if not all of the
> variable-length vectors with fixed limits with ones with
> variable-length limits as in MLS's `T<V>` syntax (see RFC 9420 S
> 2.1.2). Once you have done this, then you can just naturally carry
> arbitrarily large extensions. We can discuss whether this would be a
> global replacement (all vectors) or a targeted one
> ("large_extensions").
>
>          Yes, the MLS-like encoding of the length is possible and thank
> you for bringing it.
>          My concern here (perhaps wrong) is middleboxes.
>          If they don't understand new format they can drop these messages.
>          With a separate message (after the CH or SH) they (hopefully)
>          will ignore anything outside the CH and SH.
>
>
>
> I don't see any reason to think that that's true. In any case, those
> middleboxes
>
> are defective and we should not cater to them.
>
>
>
>             I was told countless number of times by TLS people that
> middleboxes *are* a concern in real life.
>
>          I honestly don't know.
>

They are a concern, but I don't think there's any reason to think the
extra message thing is less of an issue.

a bunch of round trips. It *might* be worth it for ECH, but I'd
> want to see some evidence that ECH was really going to exceed 64K.
>
>          ECH is a concern.
>
> Why? McEliece ciphertexts are small.
>
>
>
>          ECH contains public keys, not?
>

It contains the ClientHello, which in this case would have the McEliece
public
key, so you'd do the same thing as without ECH, namely omit the key in
CH1.

-Ekr

>          And with a new format there must be some negotiation of whether
>
>          both the network-facing server and the ultimate-end server
> support it
>
>          HRR happens only with network-facing Userver, no?
>
>          At least this is my vague understanding, it could be plainly
> wrong, I'm not very familiar with ECH.
>
>
>
>          Regards,
>
>          Valery.
>
>
>
> -Ekr
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to