Hi Joe and Sean,I have the same concern as Stephen. Please precisely specify the binary outcome of the WGLC.
Moreover, please add the following to the list: * Bring an attestation of ML-KEM from Crypto Review Panel [0] of CFRG * Improve the security considerations to thoroughly and precisely discuss threat model, all the risks and concerns, such as [1] * Recommend hybrids first (draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update): apples and oranges should not be put in the same categoryOn your third bullet, I believe the question should not be /whether/ to include motivation or not; it should be /how/ to improve the motivation. IEEE 802.11 liaison statement should be cited here, whenever it becomes available. I don't see it yet on Liaison Statements page. What if some other SDO sends a LS not to publish it? Which one do we prefer?
Sincerely, -Usama [0] https://wiki.ietf.org/group/cfrg/CryptoPanel [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/jlsYHENwqMv-4XPRvunqKsAL36k/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
