On 03.05.26 00:54, Eric Rescorla wrote:
As David Benjamin said earlier, It's possible that a much skinnier documentBy mentioning plans for ML-KEM, I actually meant to say that part might move to a new document. However, it is clearly relevant for this draft.that was *just* about refining the process of WG communication with the FATT would be worth pursuing,
but I'd first want to see some significant enthusiasm from other WG members
Frankly speaking, how many WG members actually /do/ to the formal analysis?
and especially existing FATT members.
Already requested chairs. Best, -Usama
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
