On Sun, Jun 7, 2026 at 12:59 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [0] As a technical matter, if the WG came to consensus *not* to > publish the document, we could pull it back; I see essentially > no chance that will happen. > > [1] Standalone ML-KEM is a different case because it is still > with the WG, although I don't think debate on that topic > is very productive either at this point. > Correction: these footnotes are reversed. Sorry about that.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
