Hi Charlie, Thanks for the review.
> (3) Section 3.3 explicitly says that these algorithms MUST NOT be used in > TLS 1.2 or earlier versions. While it's hard to imagine anyone rushing out > to support new algorithms in old protocols, I don't see why it is important > to disallow them, and if they were to support them it would seem > appropriate to use these same code points. The normative language is indeed superfluous, certainly after draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen lands; the comments was put in place to be explicit. Martin Thomson and Usama Sardar also would like to see it go, but otherwise the WG remained silent on the topic. This PR would remove the normative language: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-mldsa/pull/37 Nit: > First paragraph of section 3: "as follows as follows" should be "as > follows" https://github.com/tlswg/tls-mldsa/pull/38 Thank you, Bas
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
