On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:21 PM Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you're taking an informal poll, then my opinions would be: > I was actually trying to suggest a structure for going forward, perhaps starting with a presentation/discussion on (1) in Vienna. -Ekr > 1: Yes > > 2: I'd suggest adopting the draft draft-reddy-tls-composite-mldsa - it is > the technically the simplest from a TLS perspective. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2026 4:14 PM > *To:* Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [TLS] Re: Upleveling on PQ + T signatures for TLS > > > Hiya, > > On 25/06/2026 19:17, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > 1. Form a WG opinion on whether we need to do simultaneous > > PQ + T at all. > > > > 2. Assuming the answer to (1) is yes then try to pick one > > approach for doing it. > > The above seems reasonable. ISTM the opinions of those > maintaining (web) server packages are needed to do step > 2 above as the various approaches have consequences for > acquiring and managing server credentials. > > Cheers, > S. > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
