| If the data must remain secure after CRQC - you do not get bonus points for surviving only until CRQC.
People explained eloquently enough already why using SIKE as an argument is bad. — Regards, Uri
Secure Resilient Systems and Technologies MIT Lincoln Laboratory
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 2: 20 PM Soatok Dreamseeker <soatok. dhole@ gmail. com> wrote: Something that has already happened to a moon math submission that was not as widely understood as lattices. SIKE being broken was the international standardization
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside the Laboratory.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Something that has already happened to a moon math submission that was not as widely understood as lattices. SIKE being broken was the international standardization effort successfully working to motivate folks to find attacks against novel cryptosystems. Using it as an indictment of an unrelated algorithm is alarmingly ignorant.
Whatever you think, that /is/ the argument.
keep it clean, Rob
|
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
