From: Nathanael Ritz <[email protected]> > The real question before the IESG remains to be answered. The IAB identified > WGLC as the venue for Dr. Bernstein's technical objections, and the chairs > have restricted his ability to participate in that venue during a vote with > time limit. Whether the moderation is theoretically permissible doesn't > resolve whether it's compatible with the IAB's own guidance.
Dan’s approach is not blameless here; he understands the rules and norms IETF and by all appearances goes out of his way to not follow them. This results in things like being moderated, with the end result all the discussion tends to be about side issues of process and this and that, rather than the core technical issue he appears to want to address (pure vs hybrid). That diversion is a real shame and ends up being a waste of the IETF’s collective time. JL
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
