Hi - Note that the only hat I'm wearing here is of a long time IETF
participant.
If you've recently joined this list, perhaps solely to "vote" on
publication of a document, I wanted to give each of you a few pointers
for your edification.
1 - Getting started in the IETF -
https://www.ietf.org/participate/get-started/
2 - On Consensus and Humming in the IETF -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7282
First - the IETF does not "vote" all claims or statements to the contrary.
Working groups make decisions by rough consensus as judged by their
chairs. [2] above, while neither a standard or a BCP is IMO a
reasonable explanation of the rough consensus process. With respect
to the current discussion, I recommend reading both section 6 and
section 7 of the document.
The IETF (collective intelligence) has long experience with
variations on the themes of dog piling, greek chorus's, and sock
puppets. We tend to be able to differentiate between an
individual's considered opinion and an unconsidered solicited
"vote". We also have tools (e.g. when did you actually sign up for
the mailing list) that provide some more objective hints in this
category.
The leadership bodies (IESG, IAB) DO vote on the matters before
them. But they tend to be rather resistant to any comments but well
stated technical arguments.
Second, I strongly recommend reading [1] and appropriate links from it.
The IETF is NOT IEEE, not ISO, not OASIS, not W3C, not Global
Platform. Our procedures and the acceptable behavior around such
procedures have evolved over time, and were, at the beginning at
least, incorporated as push-back to having ISO internet standards
declared as replacing TCP/IP standards by fiat. (Ask an old timer
about Kobe, the original IAB, and the IETF reformation).
Trying to engage with the IETF without understanding the limits of
your approach in the IETF context is unlikely to provide you the
results you may be looking for. Or substitute both "IETF" with any
other organization and I believe the statement remains mostly true.
Lastly - if you've considered all of the above, and you still have a
strongly held view - informed by your own research into the problem -
express yourself! In last calls, a short 1-2 sentence explanation of
why you're supporting or opposed (or don't support but also don't
oppose) the action should be all that's needed even for a newcomer.
Oh yes - welcome! TLS is important to the IETF and *YOUR* contribution
is part of our rough consensus.
Mike
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
