OFFICIAL
>> The right question is this: is it better for the Internet that the document >> be published? > It will be (and is) published. The codepoints are there, the I-D is there and > will never be deleted. I've remained silent on this so far, but I feel like I need to address this comment. As you should be aware, from the liaison statements sent by 3GPP, O-RAN and IEEE (if not others) to the TLS WG, an I-D cannot be relied on as a reference in those SDOs. It is evident that the IETF is of the same opinion just from reading the boiler plate of the I-D. The I-D could be updated and new code points issued - as happened with the QUIC drafts for example - meaning fragmentation and incompatible deployments. Regards, Matt (3GPP SA3 delegate). OFFICIAL
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
