> From: Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 13:43:56 -0400 > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:52:07PM -0600, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > >Of course, tried and true programs like PGP and GnuPG exist exactly > >for this purpose (among others). > > True. And they provide some advantages over the fingerprint technique. > In that I'm the ONLY person who can verify my fingerprint. But w/gpg > or pgp, anyone can verify my sig, if they have access to my public key. > > Of course, the advantage of TMDA's fingerprint is that it's really > inconspicuous. It's also easy to delegate the responsibility of > fingerprinting to TMDA.
hmmm, this leads me to a question....how hard would it be for TMDA to allow correctly signed PGP/GPG messages through without a confirmation while requiring a confirmation for all other messages? Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.
msg00361/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
