Thomas -Balu- Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (manually fiddled together, since I am not on the tmda-users-list > (just reading from the archive :-).
If you don't want to subscribe, you can participate from the newsgroup news://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user > I used the default debian-package (0.51-1), since I was about to > play with it first - and that's easier by using apt-get :-) 0.51 is 8 months old, contains many bugs, and is not at all recommended. Use one of the newer Debian packages. > I've done a quick grep through tmda-rfilter for CONFIRM_ADDRESS with > no result, so I guess it was not supported then. CONFIRM_ADDRESS was introduced in the 0.48 release. > Since postfix does not support "hierarchical" .forwards, it would look > for .forward+test+confirm+accept.1037718324.12857.c5713f=b-a-l-u.de (not > find it) and .forward. Yup, the dot-qmail interface with the concept of .qmail-default is the single greatest advantage of qmail over Postfix IMHO. If Postfix had a "dot-postfix" interface, I'd probably be using it instead of qmail. > So my way to go would be to call tmda from .forward and not > .forward+test=b-a-l-u.de as I wanted to do... But then again, all my > mails would be filtered by tmda, which I wanted to avoid during my > testing-phase... How about creating a separate test account to do your testing with? That's probably about as good as you can do. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
