[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:-Are you familiar with the tag action?
Uhhh, yeah. That's why I asked about tagging. ;-)
The documentation tells me _how_ to tag, but not _what_ to tag to achieve this
result. As I said, I'm sure it is painfully obvious. I just don't get it.
Here is my thinking:
* I don't want to tag the "From" header, because I want that to always be my
external mail address.
* I don't want to use keyword addresses because those might get scarfed by a
spammer.
* I don't _think_ I want to tag the "Sender" header because other peoples
MUAs might use that for replying in some cases. (But maybe I'm confused
about that.) And some MLMs use that header.
* Maybe I want to use a dated envelope sender header? But won't that fail
to work with some MLMs?
I was kind of hoping that I could do something like this:
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag X-ireallysentthis dated=1h
or even
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag X-ireallysentthis crypt="a password I can change"
To insert a cryptographically secure header that wouldn't be used by anything
else, and then have an incoming rule accept them. But it doesn't seem possible
(from the documentation) to construct _either_ a incomming or outgoing filter
to do this.
OTOH, maybe I'm over thinking this. Maybe all I need to do is this:
outgoing: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag X-ireallsentthis yabetcha
incoming: headers 'X-ireallysentthis: yabetcha' accept
I mean, it isn't cryptographically secure, but how likely is a spammer to
parrot back this header? Is this what you had in mind?
Or am I going about this all wrong?
Thanks!
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
