On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:19:49 -0800 (PST), "Todd A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to trash (e.g. bounce or drop) messages sent to an expired > dated address, rather than sending a new challenge? Sure. Just add the following to your config file: ACTION_EXPIRED_DATED = "bounce" > For example, if a > dated address is more than 6 months old, it's doubtless been scavenged, Is it? What if you write to someone and they add your dated address to their address book without realizing what they have, and then decide to send you some mail 6 months later? The default action of "confirm" would be best in that case. > and I'd rather not waste the bandwidth challenging someone who spams we at > that address. And I sometimes give really short-term dated addresses to > e-commerce sites, since I'd rather the address expire rather than have to > explicitly revoke a keyword address later. > > Can I configure dated addresses this way? Or am I doing A Bad Thing (tm) > here? You may want to weigh the consequences for doing this. All it saves you is a little bandwidth, but you risk confusing someone in the process. If you do, I highly recommend that you modify your bounce template to explain the situation just in case the above should happen. Gre7g. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
