> "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> [ ... ] I'll take a guess that the Return-Path header of that >> message is null. > > [ ... ] > > You're right: none of these have a Return-Path header. [ ... ] > > So ... maybe my SpamAssassin step prior to TMDA might be removing > Return-Path ... ??? > > Time to do some investigating. > > [ ... ]
Well, it turns out that no incoming messages seem to have a Return-Path header. However, the RPLINE variable (which Courier sets to the value of the Return-Path header) is indeed set to a valid Return-Path. So perhaps Courier is stripping off that header ... ??? I have to check my the Courier configuration. -- Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
