On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> If someone uses the wrong sender address, but goes through the
> confirmation process, will they get bounced again if they continue to use
> that same wrong sender address?
After looking at my logs, this is exactly what is happening to at least
one correspondent (logs if you need 'em). So, two things:
1. Shouldn't whitelisting take precedence over the sender address
verification? I think it should.
2. TMDA should regenerate confirmation addresses, instead of tacking
confirms onto existing addresses the way it does now. For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is just ridiculously long. If an extension address is already a tmda
address, why can't it just be replaced with the new extension
address, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The DMCA is anti-consumer. The RIAA has no right to rewrite copyright
laws to suit themselves.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
